Byzantine
art
is the term commonly used to describe the
artistic products of the Byzantine Empire from about the 4th century
until the Fall of
Constantinople in 1453.
The term can also be used
for the art of Eastern Orthodox states which were
contemporary with the Byzantine Empire and were culturally
influenced by it, without actually being part of it (the "Byzantine commonwealth"),
such as Bulgaria, Serbia,
or Rus
and also for the art of the Republic of Venice
and Kingdom of Sicily, which had close ties to
the Byzantine Empire despite being in other respects part of western European
culture. Art produced by Eastern Orthodox
Christians living in the Ottoman Empire is often called "post-Byzantine."
Certain artistic traditions that originated in the Byzantine Empire,
particularly in regard to icon painting and church architecture, are maintained
in Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria, Russia
and other Eastern Orthodox countries to the present day.
Introduction
Just as the Byzantine Empire
represented the political continuation of the Roman Empire, Byzantine art developed
out of the art of the Roman empire, which was itself
profoundly influenced by ancient Greek
art.
Byzantine art never lost sight of this classical heritage. The Byzantine
capital, Constantinople, was adorned with a large
number of classical sculptures, although they eventually became an object of
some puzzlement for its inhabitants. And indeed, the art produced during the
Byzantine Empire, although marked by periodic revivals of a classical
aesthetic, was above all marked by the development of a new aesthetic.
The most salient feature of
this new aesthetic was its “abstract,” or anti-naturalistic character. If
classical art was marked by the attempt to create representations that mimicked
reality as closely as possible, Byzantine art seems to have abandoned this
attempt in favor of a more symbolic approach.


Miniatures of the 6th-century Rabula Gospel
display the more abstract and symbolic nature of Byzantine art.
The nature and causes of
this transformation, which largely took place during late antiquity, have been a subject of
scholarly debate for centuries. Giorgio Vasari attributed it to a decline
in artistic skills and standards, which had in turn been revived by his
contemporaries in the Italian Renaissance.
Although this point of view has been occasionally revived, most notably by Bernard Berenson,[4] modern scholars tend to take a more positive view of
the Byzantine aesthetic. Alois Riegl and Josef Strzygowski,
writing in the early 20th century, were above all responsible for the
revaluation of late antique art.[5] Riegl saw it as a natural
development of pre-existing tendencies in Roman art, whereas Strzygowski viewed
it as a product of “oriental” influences. Notable recent contributions to the
debate include those of Ernst Kitzinger,[6] who traced a “dialectic”
between “abstract" and "Hellenistic” tendencies in late antiquity,
and John Onians,[7] who saw an “increase in
visual response” in late antiquity, through which a viewer “could look at
something which was in twentieth-century terms purely abstract and find it
representational.”
In any case, the debate is purely modern: it
is clear that most Byzantine viewers did not consider their art to be abstract
or unnaturalistic. As Cyril Mango has observed, “our own
appreciation of Byzantine art stems largely from the fact that this art is not
naturalistic; yet the Byzantines themselves, judging by their extant
statements, regarded it as being highly naturalistic and as being directly in
the tradition of Phidias, Apelles, and Zeuxis.”[8]


Frescoes in Nerezi near Skopje (1164), with their unique blend of high
tragedy, gentle humanity, and homespun realism, anticipate the approach of Giotto and other proto-Renaissance Italian artists.
The subject matter of monumental Byzantine
art was primarily religious and imperial: the two themes are often combined, as
in the portraits of later Byzantine emperors that decorated the interior of the
sixth-century church of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople. These
preoccupations are partly a result of the pious and autocratic nature of
Byzantine society, and partly a result of its economic structure: the wealth of
the empire was concentrated in the hands of the church and the imperial office,
which therefore had the greatest opportunity to undertake monumental artistic
commissions.
Religious art was not, however, limited to
the monumental decoration of church interiors. One of the most important genres
of Byzantine art was the icon,
an image of Christ, the Virgin, or a saint, used as an object of veneration in
Orthodox churches and private homes alike. Icons were more religious than
aesthetic in nature: especially after the end of iconoclasm, they were
understood to manifest the unique “presence” of the figure depicted by means of
a “likeness” to that figure maintained through carefully maintained canons of
representation.[9]
The illumination of manuscripts was another
major genre of Byzantine art. The most commonly illustrated texts were religious,
both scripture itself (particularly the Psalms) and devotional or theological
texts (such as the Ladder of Divine
Ascent of John Climacus or the homilies of Gregory of
Nazianzus). Secular texts were also illuminated: important
examples include the Alexander Romance and the history of John Skylitzes.
The Byzantines inherited the Early Christian
distrust of monumental sculpture in
religious art, and produced only reliefs,
of which very few survivals are anything like life-size, in sharp contrast to
the medieval art of the West, where monumental sculpture revived from Carolingian art
onwards. Small ivories were also mostly in relief.
“Minor” or “luxury” arts (i.e. ivories, steatites, enamels, jewelry,
metalwork, ceramics, etc.) were produced in large number throughout the
Byzantine era. Many of these were also religious in nature, although a large
number of objects with secular or non-representational decoration were produced:
for example, ivories representing themes from classical mythology, and ceramics
decorated with figures that may derive from the Akritic epics.
Periods
Early Byzantine art


Leaf from an ivory diptych of Areobindus
Dagalaiphus Areobindus, consul in Constantinople, 506. Areobindus
is shown above, presiding over the games in the Hippodrome, depicted beneath.
Two events were of fundamental importance to
the development of a unique, Byzantine art. First, the Edict of Milan, issued by the emperors Constantine I
and Licinius in
313, allowed for public Christian worship, and led to the development of a
monumental, Christian art. Second, the dedication of Constantinople in 330 created a great new
artistic centre for the eastern half of the Empire, and a specifically
Christian one. Other artistic traditions flourished in rival cities such as Alexandria, Antioch, and Rome, but it was not until all of these cities
had fallen - the first two to the Arabs
and Rome to the Goths -
that Constantinople established its supremacy.
Constantine devoted great effort to the
decoration of Constantinople, adorning its public spaces with ancient statuary,[10] and building a forum
dominated by a porphyry column that carried a statue of himself.[11] Major Constantinopolitan
churches built under Constantine and his son, Constantius II, included the original
foundations of Hagia Sophia and the Church of the
Holy Apostles.[12]
The next major building campaign in
Constantinople was sponsored by Theodosius I. The most important
surviving monument of this period is the obelisk and base erected by Theodosius
in the Hippodrome.[13] The earliest surviving
church in Constantinople is the Basilica of St. John at the Stoudios Monastery, built in the
fifth century.[14]
Due to subsequent rebuilding and destruction,
relatively few Constantinopolitan monuments of this early period survive.
However, the development of monumental early Byzantine art can still be traced
through surviving structures in other cities. For example, important early
churches are found in Rome (including Santa Sabina and Santa
Maria Maggiore),[15] and in Thessaloniki
(the Rotunda
and the Acheiropoietos
Basilica).[16]
A number of important illuminated
manuscripts, both sacred and secular, survive from this early period. Classical
authors, including Virgil
(represented by the Vergilius
Vaticanus[17] and the Vergilius Romanus[18]) and Homer (represented by the Ambrosian Iliad), were illustrated with
narrative paintings. Illuminated biblical manuscripts of this period survive
only in fragments: for example, the Quedlinburg
Itala fragment is a small portion of what must have been a
lavishly illustrated copy of 1 Kings.[19]
Early Byzantine art was also marked by the
cultivation of ivory carving.[20] Ivory diptychs, often elaborately
decorated, were issued as gifts by newly appointed consuls.[21] Silver plates were another
important form of luxury art:[22] among the most lavish from this period is the Missorium of
Theodosius I.[23] Sarcophagi continued to be produced
in great numbers.
[edit]
The Age of Justinian
Significant changes in Byzantine art
coincided with the reign of Justinian I (527-565). Justinian
devoted much of his reign to reconquering Italy, North Africa and Spain. He
also laid the foundations of the imperial absolutism of the Byzantine state,
codifying its laws and imposing his religious views on all his subjects by law.[24]


Mosaic from San Vitale in Ravenna, showing
the Emperor Justinian and Bishop Maximian of Ravenna surrounded by clerics and
soldiers.
A significant component of Justinian's
project of imperial renovation was a massive building program, which was
described in a book, the Buildings, written by Justinian's court
historian, Procopius.[25] Justinian renovated,
rebuilt, or founded anew countless churches within Constantinople, including Hagia Sophia,[26] which had been destroyed
during the Nika riots, the Church of the
Holy Apostles,[27] and the Church of Saints Sergius and Bacchus.[28] Justinian also built a
number of churches and fortifications outside of the imperial capital,
including the Monastery
of St. Catherine on the Sinai Peninsula,[29] and the Basilica of St.
John in Ephesus.[30]
Several major churches of this period were
built in the provinces by local bishops in imitation of the new
Constantinopolitan foundations. The Basilica of San Vitale in
Ravenna,
was built by Bishop Maximianus.
The decoration of San Vitale includes important mosaics of Justinian and his
empress, Theodora,
although neither ever visited the church.[31] Also of note is the Euphrasian Basilica in
Poreč.[32]
19-20th century archeological discoveries
unearthed a large group of Early
Byzantine mosaics in the Middle East. The eastern provinces of
the Eastern Roman
and later the Byzantine Empires inherited a strong
artistic tradition from the Late Antiquity. Christian mosaic art
flourished in this area from the 4th century onwards. The tradition of making
mosaics was carried on in the Umayyad era until the end of the
8th century. The most important surviving examples are the Madaba Map, the mosaics of Mount Nebo, Saint
Catherine's Monastery on Mount Sinai and the Church of St
Stephen in ancient Kastron Mefaa (now Umm ar-Rasas).
The first fully-preserved illuminated
biblical manuscripts date to the first half of the sixth century, most notably
the Vienna Genesis,[33] the Rossano Gospels,[34] and the Sinope Gospels.[35] The Vienna Dioscurides is
a lavishly illustrated botanical treatise, presented as a gift to the Byzantine
aristocrat Julia Anicia.[36]
Important ivory sculptures of this period
include the Barberini ivory, which probably depicts
Justinian himself, [37] and the Archangel ivory in
the British Museum.[38] Silver plate continued to
be decorated with scenes drawn from classical mythology; for example, a plate preserved in the Cabinet des Médailles,
Paris, depicts Hercules wrestling the Nemean lion.
[edit]
The seventh-century crisis


Mosaic from the church of Hagios Demetrios in
Thessaloniki,
late 7th or early 8th century, showing St.
Demetrios with donors.
The Age of Justinian was followed by a
political decline, since most of Justinian's conquests were lost and the Empire
faced acute crisis with the invasions of the Avars, Slavs, Persians
and Arabs in
the 7th century. Constantinople was also wracked by religious and political
conflict.[39]
The most significant surviving monumental
projects of this period were undertaken outside of the imperial capital. The
church of Hagios Demetrios in Thessaloniki was
rebuilt after a fire in the mid-seventh century. The new sections include
mosaics executed in a remarkably abstract style.[40] The church of the Koimesis
in Nicaea (present-day Iznik),
destroyed in the early 20th century but documented through photographs,
demonstrates the simultaneous survival of a more classical style of church
decoration.[41] The churches of Rome,
still a Byzantine territory in this period, also include important surviving
decorative programs, especially Santa Maria
Antiqua, Sant'Agnese
fuori le mura, and the Chapel of San Venanzio in San Giovanni in
Laterano.[42] Byzantine mosaicists
probably also contributed to the decoration of the early Umayyad monuments, including the Dome of the Rock in
Jerusalem
and the Great Mosque of Damascus.[43]
Important works of luxury art from this
period include the silver David Plates, produced during the reign
of Heraclius,
and depicting scenes from the life of the Hebrew king David.[44] The most notable surviving
manuscripts are Syriac
gospel books, such as the so-called Syriac Bible of
Paris.[45] However, the London Canon Tables
bear witness to the continuing production of lavish gospel books in Greek.[46]
The period between Justinian and iconoclasm
saw major changes in the social and religious roles of images within Byzantium.
The veneration of acheiropoieta, or holy images "not
made by human hands," became a significant phenomenon, and in some
instances these images were credited with saving cities from military assault.
By the end of the seventh century, certain images of saints had come to be
viewed as "windows" through which one could communicate with the
figure depicted. Proskynesis before images is also
attested in texts from the late seventh century. These developments mark the
beginnings of a theology of icons.[47]
At the same time, the debate over the proper
role of art in the decoration of churches intensified. Three
canons of the Quinisext Council of 692 addressed
controversies in this area: prohibition of the representation of the cross on
church pavements (Canon 73), prohibition of the representation of Christ as a
lamb (Canon 82), and a general injunction against "pictures, whether they
are in paintings or in what way so ever, which attract the eye and corrupt the
mind, and incite it to the enkindling of base pleasures" (Canon 100).
Iconoclasm


Helios in
his chariot, surrounded by symbols of the months and of the zodiac. From Vat.
Gr. 1291, the "Handy Tables" of Ptolemy, produced during the reign
of Constantine V.
Intense debate over the role of art in
worship led eventually to the period of "Byzantine iconoclasm."[48] Sporadic outbreaks of
iconoclasm on the part of local bishops are attested in Asia Minor during the
720s. In 726, an underwater earthquake between the islands of Thera and
Therasia was interpreted by Emperor Leo III as
a sign of God's anger, and may have led Leo to remove a famous icon of Christ
from the Chalke Gate outside the imperial
palace.[49] However, iconoclasm
probably did not become imperial policy until the reign of Leo's son, Constantine V.
The Council of Hieria, convened under
Constantine in 754, proscribed the manufacture of icons of Christ. This
inaugurated the Iconoclastic period, which lasted, with
interruptions, until 843.
While iconoclasm severely restricted the role
of religious art, and led to the removal of some earlier apse mosaics and
(possibly) the sporadic destruction of portable icons, it never constituted a
total ban on the production of figural art. Ample literary sources indicate
that secular art (i.e. hunting scenes and depictions of the games in the
hippodrome) continued to be produced,[50] and the few monuments that
can be securely dated to the period (most notably the manuscript of Ptolemy's
"Handy Tables" today held by the Vatican[51]) demonstrate that
metropolitan artists maintained a high quality of production.[52]
Major churches dating to this period include Hagia Eirene in
Constantinople, which was rebuilt in the 760s following its destruction by an
earthquake in 740. The interior of Hagia Eirene, which is dominated by a large
mosaic cross in the apse, is one of the best-preserved examples of iconoclastic
church decoration.[53] The church of Hagia Sophia
in Thessaloniki was also rebuilt in the late 8th century.[54]
Certain churches built outside of the empire
during this period, but decorated in a figural, "Byzantine," style,
may also bear witness to the continuing activities of Byzantine artists.
Particularly important in this regard are the original mosaics of the Palatine Chapel
in Aachen (since either destroyed or heavily restored) and the
frescoes in the Church of Maria foris portas in Castelseprio.
Macedonian
Art
Main article: Macedonian art (Byzantine)
The rulings of the Council of Hieria were
reversed by a new church council in 843, celebrated to this day in the Eastern
Orthodox Church as the "Triumph of Orthodoxy." In 867, the
installation of a new apse mosaic in Hagia Sophia depicting the Virgin and
Child was celebrated by the Patriarch Photios in
a famous homily as a victory over the evils of iconoclasm. Later in the same
year, the Emperor Basil I, called "the
Macedonian," acceded to the throne; as a result the following period of
Byzantine art has sometimes been called the "Macedonian Renaissance,"
although the term is doubly problematic (it was neither "Macedonian,"
nor, strictly speaking, a "Renaissance").
In the 9th and 10th centuries the Empire's
military situation improved, and patronage of art and architecture increased.
New churches were commissioned, and the standard architectural form (the "cross-in-square")
and decorative scheme of the Middle Byzantine church were standardised. Major
surviving examples include Hosios Loukas in Boeotia, the Daphni Monastery
near Athens
and Nea Moni on
Chios.
There was a revival of interest in the
depiction of subjects from classical mythology (as on the Veroli Casket) and in
the use of a "classical" style to depict religious, and particularly
Old Testament, subjects (of which the Paris Psalter and the Joshua Roll
are important examples)
The Macedonian period also saw a revival of
the late antique technique of ivory
carving. Many ornate ivory triptychs and diptychs survive, such as the Harbaville Triptych
and a triptych at Luton Hoo, dating from the reign of Nicephorus Phocas).
Comnenian
Age
The Macedonian emperors were followed by the Komnenian dynasty, beginning with the reign
of Alexios I Komnenos in
1081. Byzantium had recently suffered a period of severe dislocation following
the battle of
Manzikert in 1071 and the subsequent loss of Asia Minor to the
Turks. However, the Komnenoi brought stability to the empire, (1081-1185), and
during the course of the twelfth century their energetic campaigning did much
to restore the fortunes of the empire. The Komnenoi were great patrons of the
arts, and with their support Byzantine artists continued to move in the
direction of greater humanism and emotion, of which the Theotokos of Vladimir,
the cycle of mosaics at Daphni,
and the murals at Nerezi
yield important examples. Ivory sculpture and other expensive mediums of art
gradually gave way to frescoes and icons, which for the first time gained
widespread popularity across the Empire. Apart from painted icons, there were
other varieties - notably the mosaic and ceramic ones.


The Annunciation from Ohrid, one of the most admired icons of the Paleologan Mannerism, bears comparison with the
finest contemporary works by Italian artists.
Some of the finest Byzantine work of this
period may be found outside the Empire: in the mosaics of Gelati, Kiev, Torcello, Venice, Monreale, Cefalù and Palermo. For instance, Venice's Basilica of St
Mark, begun in 1063, was based on the great Church of the
Holy Apostles in Constantinople, now destroyed, and is
thus an echo of the age of Justinian. The acquisitive habits of the Venetians
mean that the basilica is also a great museum of Byzantine artworks of all kinds
(e.g., Pala d'Oro).
Palaeologan
Age
Eight hundred years of continuous Byzantine
culture were brought to an abrupt end in 1204 with the sacking of
Constantinople by the knights of the Fourth Crusade, a disaster from which the
Empire never recovered. Although the Byzantines regained the city in 1261, the
Empire was thereafter a small and weak state confined to the Greek peninsula
and the islands of the Aegean.
Nevertheless the Palaeologan Dynasty, beginning with Michael VIII Palaeologus in
1259, was a last golden age of Byzantine art, partly because of the increasing
cultural exchange between Byzantine and Italian artists. Byzantine artists
developed a new interest in landscapes and pastoral scenes, and the traditional
mosaic-work (of which the Chora Church in Constantinople is
the finest extant example) gradually gave way to detailed cycles of narrative
frescoes (as evidenced in a large group of Mystras churches). The icons,
which became a favoured medium for artistic expression, were characterized by a
less austere attitude, new appreciation for purely decorative qualities of
painting and meticulous attention to details, earning the popular name of the
Paleologan Mannerism for the period in general.
Crete had
been ruled by the Venetians since 1211, and the Cretan school of icon-painting gradually
introduced Western elements into its style, and exported large numbers of icons
to the West. After the fall of the Empire, Crete became the centre of Greek
art, until it too fell to the Turks in 1669.
Legacy


St Mark's Basilica in
Venice, where imported Byzantine mosaicists were succeeded by Italians they had
trained.
The splendour of Byzantine art was always in
the mind of early medieval Western artists and patrons, and many of the most
important movements in the period were conscious attempts to produce art fit to
stand next to both classical Roman and contemporary Byzantine art. This was
especially the case for the imperial Carolingian art and Ottoman art.
Luxury products from the Empire were highly valued, and reached for example the
royal Anglo-Saxon Sutton Hoo burial in
Suffolk of
the 620s, which contains several pieces of silver. Byzantine silks were especially valued and
large quantities were distributed as diplomatic gifts from Constantinople.
There are records of Byzantine artists working in the West, especially during
the period of iconoclasm, and some works, like the frescos at Castelseprio
and miniatures in the Vienna
Coronation Gospels, seem to have been produced by such figures.
In particular, teams of mosaic artists were dispatched as diplomatic
gestures by emperors to Italy, where
they often trained locals to continue their work in a style heavily
influenced by Byzantium. Venice
and Norman Sicily
were particular canters of Byzantine influence. The earliest surviving panel
paintings in the West were in a style heavily influenced by contemporary
Byzantine icons, until a distinctive Western style began to develop in Italy in
the Trecento;
the traditional and still influential narrative of Vasari
and others has the story of Western painting begin as a breakaway by Cimabue and then Giotto from the shackles of the Byzantine
tradition. In general Byzantine artistic influence on Europe was in steep
decline by the 14th century if not earlier, despite the continued importance of
migrated Byzantine
scholars in the Renaissance in other areas.
Islamic art began with artists and
craftsmen mostly trained in Byzantine styles, and though figurative content was
greatly reduced, Byzantine decorative styles remained a great influence on
Islamic art, and Byzantine artists continued to be imported for important works
for some time, especially for mosaics.


Modern Orthodox mural from Israel using a
depiction of the Nativity of
Christ little changed in over a millennium.
The Byzantine era properly defined came to an
end with the fall of
Constantinople to the Ottoman Turks in 1453, but by this time
the Byzantine cultural heritage had been widely diffused, carried by the spread
of Orthodox Christianity, to Bulgaria, Serbia, Romania and, most importantly, to Russia, which became the centre of the Orthodox
world following the Ottoman conquest of the Balkans. Even under Ottoman rule,
Byzantine traditions in icon-painting and other small-scale arts survived,
especially in the Venetian-ruled Crete and Rhodes,
where a "post-Byzantine" style under increasing Western influence
survived for a further two centuries, producing artists including El Greco whose training was in the Cretan School
which was the most vigorous post-Byzantine school, exporting great numbers of
icons to Europe.
Russian icon painting began by entirely
adopting and imitating Byzantine art, as did the art of other Orthodox nations,
and has remained extremely conservative in iconography, although its painting
style has developed distinct characteristics, including influences from
post-Renaissance Western art. All the Eastern Orthodox churches have retained
highly protective of their traditions in terms of the form and content of
images and, for example, modern Orthodox depictions of
the Nativity of Christ very little in content from those developed
in the 6th century.
No comments:
Post a Comment